It was different. Much more subtle than other Bond films. The new image they've created for 007 is very good (except where he gets gay at the end) but the actor guy didn't really pull it off in my opinion. The leading lady on the other hand had an 'okay' character played by a very talented actor. The story was good, if a little difficult to follow although it seams to me as though it was engineered to take advantage in the recent growth in the popularity of Hold 'Em. I was disappointed to miss out on the usual 007 gadgets and they're usual supplier, the ubiquitous and wise cracking 'Q' (most recently played by John Cleese) although I see this as part of the aim of reducing the spectacle of the film - I had similar feelings when the Bondmobile failed to produce rockets, spiked tires or even remote control.
Overall it was an interesting new angle for the series to take but I wonder at how much they've sacrificed for the sake of it.
4 comments:
Instead of a blog I decided to review a movie.
They're = contraction of "They Are"
Their = possessive, indicates a state of belonging: "Their creator"
There = Direction: "Over There"
Instead of a comment, i did a grammar lesson.
Meanwhile, Rory needs to buy an inside-out ball
Look, if you want to play fistycuffs Chuck Norris and Vin Diesel are right here waiting for you.
Can't I just borrow your inside out ball?
no, you must BUY one. Its a life requirement. P.s. the bondmobile practically brought the hot bond back to life, can your watch do that? eh? EH?
Post a Comment